PULSEKITA SIASATAN

Ikuti kronologi. Semak bukti dan status kes.

Setiap kes disusun mengikut masa dengan bukti, individu dan status undang-undang dipaparkan berasingan supaya fakta tidak bercampur dengan dakwaan.

01 Fakta dan dakwaan dipisahkan02 Bukti dipaparkan mengikut bila ia muncul dalam rekod03 Perkara yang belum disahkan ditanda dengan jelas
Lihat data berkaitan → pembunuhan, rompakan, rasuah, pemerdagangan dan keselamatan sekolah
REKONSTRUKSI KES INTERAKTIF

Sosilawati Lawiya: four victims, four accused, different final outcomes

Gombak, Banting, Shah Alam & Putrajaya, Malaysia · 30 Aug 2010–8 Oct 2024

Concluded conviction appeals · sentence review decided
KESEDIAAN KES SEBENARSedia untuk semakan editorial
0 halangan0 amaran
30 Aug 2010Dilaporkan
Dijeda · petunjuk 1 daripada 9

Sosilawati and three companions travel to Banting

Reporting states Sosilawati left her home in Gombak for Banting concerning a land matter, accompanied by Noorhisham Mohamad, Ahmad Kamil Abdul Karim and Kamaruddin Shamsuddin.

APA YANG DIKETAHUI PENYIASAT SETAKAT INISiasatan hanya boleh bergantung pada bahan yang sudah muncul setakat titik ini dalam kronologi.
1bahan bukti telah dikenal pasti4individu / peranan dalam paparan1rekod sumber dilampirkan2lokasi dikenal pasti
Sosilawati Lawiya
VictimSosilawati Lawiya

Cosmetics entrepreneur who travelled to Banting on 30 August 2010 regarding a land matter.

Noorhisham Mohamad in archival Sosilawati case imagery
VictimNoorhisham Mohamad

Bank officer who accompanied Sosilawati Lawiya.

Ahmad Kamil Abdul Karim in archival Sosilawati case imagery
VictimAhmad Kamil Abdul Karim

Lawyer who accompanied Sosilawati Lawiya.

Kamaruddin Shamsuddin in archival Sosilawati case imagery
VictimKamaruddin Shamsuddin

Driver who accompanied Sosilawati Lawiya.

RINGKASAN KES

Kes dalam satu pandangan.

Ringkasan ini sentiasa menunjukkan keadaan terkini keseluruhan kes. Ia tidak berubah apabila pembaca menggerakkan kronologi di atas.

STATUS SEMASAConcluded conviction appeals · sentence review decided

The Federal Court rejected the sentence-review applications of Pathmanabhan and Thilaiyalagan. Kathavarayan withdrew his application, which was struck out, leaving his sentence in place.

RAYUAN · 8 Oct 2024Death-sentence review decided
Sosilawati Lawiya
Sosilawati LawiyaVictim
Noorhisham Mohamad in archival Sosilawati case imagery
Noorhisham MohamadVictim
Ahmad Kamil Abdul Karim in archival Sosilawati case imagery
Ahmad Kamil Abdul KarimVictim
Kamaruddin Shamsuddin in archival Sosilawati case imagery
Kamaruddin ShamsuddinVictim
LOKASI UTAMAGombak, Banting, Shah Alam & Putrajaya, Malaysia

Lokasi dan laluan yang mempunyai rekod dalam keseluruhan kes.

GombakDeparture point
Ladang Gadong, BantingFarm / charged offence location
River near the farmPolice reconstruction
Shah Alam High CourtTrial court
Putrajaya courtsAppellate courts
DilaporkanGombak → Ladang Gadong, Banting
ORANG & BUKTI8 individu · 7 bahan bukti

Individu dan bahan utama yang membantu pembaca memahami kes.

Sosilawati Lawiya
Sosilawati LawiyaVictim
Noorhisham Mohamad in archival Sosilawati case imagery
Noorhisham MohamadVictim
Ahmad Kamil Abdul Karim in archival Sosilawati case imagery
Ahmad Kamil Abdul KarimVictim
Kamaruddin Shamsuddin in archival Sosilawati case imagery
Kamaruddin ShamsuddinVictim
Nota undang-undangTangkapan ≠ pertuduhan. Pertuduhan ≠ sabitan. Status individu di atas menggunakan rekod terkini yang disokong sumber.
SOALAN TERBUKA

Apa yang masih belum terjawab?

  1. Which full-text trial and appellate judgments can be added to the source ledger as primary legal records?
  2. Which exhibits identified in the High Court judgment can be mapped individually without overstating what each exhibit proves?
  3. Which evidentiary distinctions led the Federal Court to acquit R. Matan while affirming the other three convictions?
PIAWAIAN EDITORIAL

Bagaimana PulseKita mengendalikan sesuatu kes.

  • The case is reconstructed accused-by-accused so a conviction against one person is never treated as evidence of another person's guilt.
  • The no-body aspect is explained through the court's combined-evidence reasoning rather than sensationalized.
  • Police reconstruction is labelled as police reconstruction until later court findings establish legal conclusions.
  • R. Matan's 2017 acquittal replaces his earlier convicted status in the live status view.
  • The 2024 proceeding is treated as a sentence review for the three remaining convicted men, not a retrial of guilt.
INVESTIGATION V1–V7

Satu rekod kes digunakan untuk kronologi, bukti dan visual.

Setiap kes menyimpan kronologi, bukti, status undang-undang, dakwaan, percanggahan, lokasi dan sumber dalam satu rekod. Data yang sama digunakan untuk halaman cerita, visual dan video sosial.

KronologiPeristiwa mengikut urutan masa
Papan buktiHubungan antara bukti tanpa membuat tuduhan
Video sosialRingkasan visual berdasarkan rekod kes
Fail kesSumber, dokumen dan status terkini
CASE LIBRARY

Explore Investigation cases

Start with an editorial pathway, search by person or case, or compare how evidence and legal outcomes differ across investigations.

5real cases
58source records
1unsolved cases
START HEREChoose how you want to enter the archive.
6cases shown