PULSEKITA · SIASATAN

Noritta Samsudin: when the prosecution case did not reach prima facie

A source-led reconstruction of the 2003 murder of Noritta Samsudin, the prosecution of Hanif Basree Abdul Rahman, the High Court acquittal without his defence being called, and the appellate decisions that left the acquittal intact.

MalaysiaKuala Lumpur & Putrajaya, MalaysiaDec 2003–28 Mar 2008Acquittal final · murder remains unsolved
Noritta Samsudin and Hanif Basree Abdul Rahman in archival case imagery
FOTO KESArchival public reporting
REKONSTRUKSI KES INTERAKTIF

Noritta Samsudin: when the prosecution case did not reach prima facie

Kuala Lumpur & Putrajaya, Malaysia · Dec 2003–28 Mar 2008

Acquittal final · murder remains unsolved
KESEDIAAN KES SEBENARSedia untuk semakan editorial
0 halangan2 amaran
warningstatus after terminal

Person has a later status after a terminal legal outcome: Acquittal upheld

warningstatus after terminal

Person has a later status after a terminal legal outcome: Acquittal final

Dec 2003Disahkan
Dijeda · petunjuk 1 daripada 10

Hanif Basree charged with Noritta Samsudin's murder

Hanif was charged with murder and later claimed trial when the case was transferred to the High Court.

APA YANG DIKETAHUI PENYIASAT SETAKAT INISiasatan hanya boleh bergantung pada bahan yang sudah muncul setakat titik ini dalam kronologi.
0bahan bukti telah dikenal pasti2individu / peranan dalam paparan1rekod sumber dilampirkan1lokasi dikenal pasti
Hanif Basree Abdul Rahman in archival case imagery
ChargedHanif Basree Abdul Rahman

Charged with murder; the allegation remained to be proved.

RINGKASAN KES

Kes dalam satu pandangan.

Ringkasan ini sentiasa menunjukkan keadaan terkini keseluruhan kes. Ia tidak berubah apabila pembaca menggerakkan kronologi di atas.

STATUS SEMASAAcquittal final · murder remains unsolved

The Federal Court dismissed the prosecution's appeal, holding that the trial judge and Court of Appeal had correctly assessed the evidence and applied the law.

RAYUAN · 28 Mar 2008Federal Court affirms acquittal
Noritta Samsudin and Hanif Basree Abdul Rahman in archival case imagery
Noritta SamsudinVictim
Hanif Basree Abdul Rahman in archival case imagery
Hanif Basree Abdul RahmanAcquittal final
LOKASI UTAMAKuala Lumpur & Putrajaya, Malaysia

Lokasi dan laluan yang mempunyai rekod dalam keseluruhan kes.

Puncak Prima Galleria, Sri HartamasCrime scene
Kuala Lumpur High CourtTrial court
Putrajaya courtsAppellate courts
ORANG & BUKTI2 individu · 4 bahan bukti

Individu dan bahan utama yang membantu pembaca memahami kes.

Noritta Samsudin and Hanif Basree Abdul Rahman in archival case imagery
Noritta SamsudinVictim
Hanif Basree Abdul Rahman in archival case imagery
Hanif Basree Abdul RahmanAccused
Nota undang-undangTangkapan ≠ pertuduhan. Pertuduhan ≠ sabitan. Status individu di atas menggunakan rekod terkini yang disokong sumber.
SOALAN TERBUKA

Apa yang masih belum terjawab?

  1. What additional primary court records can be added to document the High Court's evidentiary reasoning in full?
  2. What became of the forensic leads concerning the unidentified male evidence after Hanif's acquittal?
  3. Were any later suspects formally identified, charged or excluded in the continuing investigation?
PIAWAIAN EDITORIAL

Bagaimana PulseKita mengendalikan sesuatu kes.

  • The prosecution theory is presented as allegation, not fact.
  • The High Court acquittal is represented as a threshold finding: no prima facie case was established, so the defence was not called.
  • Hanif's later appellate status never rewrites the fact that he remained acquitted throughout the prosecution appeals.
  • The unresolved murder is kept separate from Hanif's final legal status.
  • Forensic evidence is summarized only to the extent necessary to explain why the prosecution and defence differed.
WAS THIS CASE UNUSUAL?

Put the case beside the wider Malaysian numbers.

The case itself is established by its own evidence and court record. These datasets provide scale and context only; they do not explain motive, guilt or causation.

TIME-PERIOD WARNING

This case spans Dec 2003–28 Mar 2008. Some comparison series below describe more recent Malaysia-wide conditions because a directly comparable historical series is not available. PulseKita does not treat modern figures as if they were the rate at the time of the case.

HOMICIDE / MURDER

How has lethal violence changed?

PulseKita keeps the crime-index murder count separate from the SDG intentional-homicide rate because the definitions and units are not interchangeable.

Open-data murder seriescases
2016456
2017379
2018323
2019310
2020253
2021243
2022240
2023258

data.gov's crime_district series describes actual crimes where an offender was convicted. Keep it separate from newer investigation-paper counts.

Crime-index murder casescases
2022240
2023258
2024236

Crime-index murder is a PDRM crime-index series. Do not splice it into the SDG intentional-homicide rate series.

Intentional homicide, ICCScases
2024237

The 2024 ICCS intentional-homicide count is shown as a separate snapshot because the open SDG rate series currently ends in 2022. The 2024 crime-index murder count is 236, while ICCS intentional homicide is 237; the two statistical concepts must remain separate.

COMPARISON CAVEAT

Definitions changed across statistical products. PulseKita must label crime-index murder, ICCS homicide and SDG homicide rate separately.

Explore full homicide / murder data →