PULSEKITA INVESTIGATION

Follow the evidence. See what changed.

Investigation combines chronology, evidence, people and source-backed reconstruction so readers can understand a case without confusing allegation with fact.

01 Facts stay separate from allegations02 Evidence appears when investigators obtained it03 Unknown means unknown
Explore Investigation Data → homicide, robbery, corruption, trafficking, school safety and more
INTERACTIVE CASE RECONSTRUCTION

Sosilawati Lawiya: four victims, four accused, different final outcomes

Gombak, Banting, Shah Alam & Putrajaya, Malaysia · 30 Aug 2010–8 Oct 2024

Concluded conviction appeals · sentence review decided
REAL-CASE READINESSReady for editorial review
0 blockers0 warnings
30 Aug 2010Reported
Paused · clue 1 of 9

Sosilawati and three companions travel to Banting

Reporting states Sosilawati left her home in Gombak for Banting concerning a land matter, accompanied by Noorhisham Mohamad, Ahmad Kamil Abdul Karim and Kamaruddin Shamsuddin.

WHAT INVESTIGATORS KNEW AT THIS POINTInvestigators can only rely on the material revealed up to this point in the chronology.
1evidence item revealed4people / roles in view1source record attached2locations established
Sosilawati Lawiya
VictimSosilawati Lawiya

Cosmetics entrepreneur who travelled to Banting on 30 August 2010 regarding a land matter.

Noorhisham Mohamad in archival Sosilawati case imagery
VictimNoorhisham Mohamad

Bank officer who accompanied Sosilawati Lawiya.

Ahmad Kamil Abdul Karim in archival Sosilawati case imagery
VictimAhmad Kamil Abdul Karim

Lawyer who accompanied Sosilawati Lawiya.

Kamaruddin Shamsuddin in archival Sosilawati case imagery
VictimKamaruddin Shamsuddin

Driver who accompanied Sosilawati Lawiya.

CASE SNAPSHOT

The case in one view.

This summary always shows the latest overall state of the case. It does not change when the chronology above moves.

CURRENT STATUSConcluded conviction appeals · sentence review decided

The Federal Court rejected the sentence-review applications of Pathmanabhan and Thilaiyalagan. Kathavarayan withdrew his application, which was struck out, leaving his sentence in place.

APPEAL · 8 Oct 2024Death-sentence review decided
Sosilawati Lawiya
Sosilawati LawiyaVictim
Noorhisham Mohamad in archival Sosilawati case imagery
Noorhisham MohamadVictim
Ahmad Kamil Abdul Karim in archival Sosilawati case imagery
Ahmad Kamil Abdul KarimVictim
Kamaruddin Shamsuddin in archival Sosilawati case imagery
Kamaruddin ShamsuddinVictim
KEY LOCATIONSGombak, Banting, Shah Alam & Putrajaya, Malaysia

Locations and movements represented in the full case record.

GombakDeparture point
Ladang Gadong, BantingFarm / charged offence location
River near the farmPolice reconstruction
Shah Alam High CourtTrial court
Putrajaya courtsAppellate courts
ReportedGombak → Ladang Gadong, Banting
PEOPLE & EVIDENCE8 people · 7 evidence items

The main people and material needed to understand the case.

Sosilawati Lawiya
Sosilawati LawiyaVictim
Noorhisham Mohamad in archival Sosilawati case imagery
Noorhisham MohamadVictim
Ahmad Kamil Abdul Karim in archival Sosilawati case imagery
Ahmad Kamil Abdul KarimVictim
Kamaruddin Shamsuddin in archival Sosilawati case imagery
Kamaruddin ShamsuddinVictim
Legal noteArrest ≠ charge. Charge ≠ conviction. Person labels above use the latest source-supported status.
OPEN QUESTIONS

What remains unresolved?

  1. Which full-text trial and appellate judgments can be added to the source ledger as primary legal records?
  2. Which exhibits identified in the High Court judgment can be mapped individually without overstating what each exhibit proves?
  3. Which evidentiary distinctions led the Federal Court to acquit R. Matan while affirming the other three convictions?
EDITORIAL STANDARD

How PulseKita handles a case.

  • The case is reconstructed accused-by-accused so a conviction against one person is never treated as evidence of another person's guilt.
  • The no-body aspect is explained through the court's combined-evidence reasoning rather than sensationalized.
  • Police reconstruction is labelled as police reconstruction until later court findings establish legal conclusions.
  • R. Matan's 2017 acquittal replaces his earlier convicted status in the live status view.
  • The 2024 proceeding is treated as a sentence review for the three remaining convicted men, not a retrial of guilt.
INVESTIGATION V1–V7

One verified case file drives the whole investigation experience.

Every published case now uses the same structured chronology, evidence, legal-status, claims, contradictions, locations and source ledger that can also power future animation, social video and case-file formats.

ChronologyEvents in the order they became known
Evidence boardConnections without implying guilt
Social videoTurning points rendered from the same data
Case fileSources, documents and current status
CASE LIBRARY

Explore Investigation cases

Start with an editorial pathway, search by person or case, or compare how evidence and legal outcomes differ across investigations.

5real cases
58source records
1unsolved cases
START HEREChoose how you want to enter the archive.
6cases shown